GENESIS CHAPTER 36 Esau's wives and children born in Canaan, GENESIS
36:1. They remove from Jacob to Seir; the reason, GENESIS 36:6. His
posterity, GENESIS 36:9; as also that of Seir the Horite, GENESIS
36:20; among whom is Anah, who first found out mules in the
wilderness, GENESIS 36:24. His childr... [ Continue Reading ]
If this account be compared with that GENESIS 26:34, we shall find
some difficulties, which yet admit of an easy reconciliation, if these
things be considered.
1. That it is very usual, and confessed by all, that the same persons
are oft called by several names.
2. That the names of some persons ar... [ Continue Reading ]
_ 1760_ No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
ELIPHAZ, the progenitor of that _Eliphaz,_ JOB 2:11. REUEL, the father
of _Jethro._ See EXODUS 2:18 NUMBERS 10:29.... [ Continue Reading ]
He had also daughters, GENESIS 36:6, though their names be not here
mentioned.... [ Continue Reading ]
_ 1740_ QUEST.
1. Why went he thither? ANSW. Partly by his own choice, that wild and
mountainous country being very commodious for hunting, to which he
wholly addicted himself; partly by his wives persuasions, who were
both utterly averse from cohabitation with Isaac or Jacob, and
strongly inclined... [ Continue Reading ]
Which words contain the reason why that land which was large and
fruitful could not bear them, because they were not entire possessors
of it, but only sojourners in it, and therefore must take the owners
leavings, which were not sufficient for both of them and their
numerous families.... [ Continue Reading ]
This seems to be mentioned by the Holy Ghost by way of contempt or
reproach; this is he who sold his birthright for a mess of red
pottage, and therefore was called EDOM or _red._... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
_ 1715_ THESE WERE DUKES, princes or heads of their several families
and little principalities, according to the manner of those times, who
ruled their dominions, either severally, each his own, or jointly, by
common advice, or it may be under one chief prince, their superior
either in title or in p... [ Continue Reading ]
KORAH is not mentioned among the sons of Eliphaz, and therefore is
thought to be his grandson. There is another Korah, GENESIS 36:14,18.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
_ 1840_ THE SONS OF SEIR are here mentioned, partly because of their
alliance with Esau's family, GENESIS 35:2,20,22,24,25, and partly
because the government was translated from his to Esau's family. WHO
INHABITED THE LAND, and ruled there, till Esau and his posterity drove
them out, DEUTERONOMY 2:1... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
MULES; so most understand the word _Jemim, _ which is no where else
used, and give this sense of it, that he found out the way of the
generation of mules by the copulation of a horse and a mare. Others
render it _waters, _ that he found out some springs of water, which in
those hot countries were ra... [ Continue Reading ]
THE CHILDREN, Heb. _sons, _ though but one son be mentioned. Either
then he had other sons not here expressed; or the plural number is put
for the singular, as GENESIS 21:7.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
_ 1780_ No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
Among other dukes which were in that country. Or, _according to their
dukedoms_ or _principalities; _ the word _duke_ being here put for
_dukedom_ as the word _king_ is put for _kingdom,_ ISAIAH 23:15 DANIEL
7:17.... [ Continue Reading ]
He speaks of the posterity of Esau, who after they had subdued the
Horites, erected a kingdom there. Here profane wits triumph. How, say
they, could Moses write this, when as yet there was no king in Israel?
ANSW.
1. The word may be taken for any chief governor, in which sense the
title of _king_ i... [ Continue Reading ]
Where he was born or dwelt, and so in the rest. The diversity of their
cities makes it probable, that these kings had not their power by
succession, but either by election, or by usurpation, according to
Isaac's prophecy of them, GENESIS 27:40: _By thy sword thou shalt
live._... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
Of which land, see JEREMIAH 49:7,20, so called either from the city
Teman, or from Teman the son of Eliphaz, GENESIS 36:11. Or, _of the
south country, _ as the ancient translations render it.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
THE RIVER; either Euphrates, or a branch of it, called Chabras, by
which there is even at this day a city called Rahabath-melic, i.e.
King's Rahabath, as the learned observe; or some other river of note
in those times and parts.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
Either MATRED was the father, and MEZAHAB the mother; or MATRED was
the mother, and MEZAHAB the grandmother.... [ Continue Reading ]
_ 1496_ THE NAMES OF THE DUKES, of their persons, and generations, and
families. The state of Edom between the times of Esau and Moses seems
to have been this; there were first dukes, then kings, and after them
dukes again. But if it be objected, that the time was too short for a
succession of so ma... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]