LEVITICUS CHAPTER 11 From the laws concerning the priests, he now
comes to those which belong to all the people. Beasts clean and
unclean, LEVITICUS 11:1. Of fishes, LEVITICUS 11:9. Of fowls and
creeping things, LEVITICUS 11:13. In touching of a dead carcass,
LEVITICUS 11:24. Other creatures unclean... [ Continue Reading ]
Though every creature of God be good and pure in itself, as appears
from GENESIS 1:31 MATTHEW 15:11 ROMANS 14:14; yet it pleased God to
make a difference between clean and unclean, and to restrain the use
of them, which he did in general and in part before the flood, GENESIS
7:2; but more fully and... [ Continue Reading ]
CLOVEN-FOOTED, to wit, is divided into two parts only, as in the
coney, swine, &c., whereas the horse, camel, &c. have their hoofs
entire and undivided. This clause is added only to explain and limit
the former, as appears from LEVITICUS 11:26; for the feet or hoofs of
dogs, cats, &c. are parted or... [ Continue Reading ]
THE CAMEL was a usual food in Arabia, but yielding bad nourishment, as
Galen notes. DIVIDETH NOT THE HOOF, to wit, so as to have his foot
cloven in two, which being expressed LEVITICUS 11:3, is here to be
understood; otherwise the camel's hoof is divided, but it is but a
small and imperfect division... [ Continue Reading ]
Some understand by the Hebrew word _shaphan_, _a mountain mouse_,
which were of a much greater size than ordinary mice, and were used by
the Arabians for food. But for the names of the following creatures,
seeing the Jews themselves are uncertain and divided about them, I
think it improper to troubl... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
The Jews would not so much as name THE SWINE, but called it another or
a strange thing, lest the naming of it should tempt them to eat this
meat, which was so commonly used and so much esteemed by others.... [ Continue Reading ]
YE SHALL NOT TOUCH, to wit, in order to eating, as may be gathered by
comparing this with GENESIS 3:3 COLOSSIANS 2:21. For since the fat and
the skins of some of the forbidden creatures were useful for medicinal
and other good uses, and were used by good men; see MATTHEW 3:4; it is
not probable that... [ Continue Reading ]
WHATSOEVER HATH FINS AND SCALES, to wit, both of them; such fishes
being both more cleanly and more wholesome food than others. The names
of them are not particularly mentioned, partly because most of them
wanted names, the fishes not being brought to Adam and named by him as
other creatures were; a... [ Continue Reading ]
i.e. Either of the smaller sort of fishes, or of the greater, which
are called here _living creatures_ or _beasts_, as some of them are
called the beasts of the sea by other authors.... [ Continue Reading ]
AN ABOMINATION UNTO YOU, to wit, for food. This clause is added to
show that they were neither abominable in their own nature, nor for
the food of other nations; and consequently when the partition-wall
between Jews and Gentiles was taken away, these distinctions of meats
were to cease. See AC 10.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
The true signification of these and the following Hebrew words is now
lost, as the Jews at this day confess, which not falling out without
God's singular providence may intimate the cessation or abolition of
this law, the exact observation whereof since Christ came is become
impossible. In general,... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
i.e. According to the several kinds of birds, known by this general
name, which includes, besides ravens properly so called, crows, rooks,
pies, &c.... [ Continue Reading ]
THE OWL, Heb. _the daughter of the owl_, which he mentions as the best
of the kind both for sex and age, and therefore more desired for food
than the elder or males. And it is hereby implied, that the very
youngest and best of all the other kinds are forbidden, and much more
the rest.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
ALL FOWLS that crawl or creep upon the earth, and so degenerate from
their proper nature, which is to fly, and are of a mongrel kind; which
may intimate that apostates and mongrels in religion are abominable in
the sight of God, and in conversation with men. GOING UPON ALL FOUR,
upon four legs, or u... [ Continue Reading ]
WHICH HAVE LEGS ABOVE THEIR FEET. The truth of this translation may
seem evident, both from the following clause, to LEAP WITHAL, and
especially from the next verse, where one of this kind is the
_locusts_, which, as it is manifest, have two legs wherewith they
leap, besides the four feet upon which... [ Continue Reading ]
Locusts, though unusual in our food, were commonly eaten by the
Ethiopians, Libyans, Parthians, and other eastern people bordering
upon the Jews, which is expressly affirmed by Diodorus Siculus,
Aristotle, Pllny, St. Hierom, and others, as well as MATTHEW 3:4. And
it is certain that the eastern locu... [ Continue Reading ]
i.e. All such except those now mentioned; the word _other_ being here
understood out of the former verse, without which there might seem to
be a contradiction between this and that verse. But the words may be,
and by the vulgar Latin are, thus rendered, _But all flying creeping
things which have onl... [ Continue Reading ]
And such were excluded both from the courts of God's house, and from
free conversation with other men. UNTIL THE EVEN; which possibly might
signify that even the smallest defilements could not be cleansed but
by the death of Christ, who was to come and offer up himself in the
evening, or end, or dec... [ Continue Reading ]
WHOSOEVER BEARETH, or, _taketh away_, out of the place where haply it
may lie, by which others may be either offended or polluted.... [ Continue Reading ]
The word _carcasses_ is easily to be understood out of LEVITICUS
11:24,25, where it is expressed.... [ Continue Reading ]
UPON HIS PAWS, Heb. _upon his hands_, i.e. which hath feet divided
into several]parts like fingers, as dogs, eats, apes, bears, &c.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
THAT ON WHICH SUCH WATER COMETH: the meaning is, that flesh or herbs,
or other food which is dressed in water, to wit, in a vessel so
polluted, shall be unclean; not so, if it be food which is eaten dry,
as bread, fruits, &c., the reason of which difference seems to be
this, that the water did soone... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
WHEREIN THERE IS PLENTY OF WATER; of which no solid reason can be
given, whilst such unclean things remain in them, but only the will of
the Lawgiver, and his merciful condescension to men's necessities,
water being scarce in those countries; and for the same reason God
would have the ceremonial law... [ Continue Reading ]
Partly because this was necessary provision for man; and partly
because such seed would not be used for man's food till it had
received many alterations in the earth, whereby such pollution was
taken away. See 1 THESSALONIANS 12:24 1 CORINTHIANS 15:36.... [ Continue Reading ]
The reason of the difference is, partly because wet seed doth sooner
receive and longer retain any pollution; and partly because such seed
was not fit to be sown presently; and therefore that necessity which
justified the use of the dry seed, which was speedily to be sown,
could not be pretended in... [ Continue Reading ]
IF ANY BEAST DIE; either of itself, or being killed by some wild
beast, in which cases the blood was not poured forth, as it was when
they were killed by men either for food or sacrifice.... [ Continue Reading ]
HE THAT EATETH, to wit, unwittingly; for if he did it knowingly, it
was a presumptuous sin against an express law, DEUTERONOMY 14:21, and
therefore punished with cutting off, NUMBERS 15:30.... [ Continue Reading ]
Except those before expressly excepted above LEVITICUS 11:21,22... [ Continue Reading ]
UPON THE BELLY, as worms and snakes. UPON ALL FOUR as toads and divers
serpents. MORE FEET, to wit, more than four, as caterpillars, &c.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
YE SHALL BE HOLY; by which he gives them to understand, that all these
cautions and prohibitions about the eating or touching of these
creatures was not for any real uncleanness in them, all being God's
good creatures, but only that by the diligent observation of these
rules they might learn with gr... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]
No text from Poole on this verse.... [ Continue Reading ]