The indispensableness and efficacy of the death of Christ

15. for this cause i.e. on account of the grandeur of His offering.

the mediator of the new testament Rather, "a mediator of a New Covenant." Moses had been called by Philo "the Mediator" of the Old Covenant, i.e. he who came between God and Israel as the messenger of it. But Christ's intervention His coming as One who revealed God to man was accompanied with a sacrifice so infinitely more efficacious that it involved a New Covenant altogether.

by means of death This version renders the passage entirely unintelligible. The true rendering and explanation seem to be as follows: "And on this account He is a Mediator of a NewCovenant, that since death" [namely the death of sacrificial victims] "occurred for the redemption of the transgressions which took place under the first covenant those who have been called [whether Christians, or faithful believers under the Old Dispensation] may [by virtue of Christ'sdeath, which the death of those victims typified] receive [i.e. actually enjoy the fruition of, Hebrews 6:12; Hebrews 6:17; Hebrews 10:36; Hebrews 11:13] the promise of the Eternal Inheritance." Volumes of various explanations have been written on this verse, but the explanation given above is very simple. The verse is a sort of reason why Christ's death was necessary. The ultimate, a priori, reason he does not attempt to explain, because it transcends all understanding; but he merely says that since under the Old Covenant deathwas necessary, and victims had to be slain in order that by their blood men might be purified, and the High Priest might enter the Holiest Place, so, under the New Covenant, a better and more efficacious death was necessary, both to give to those old sacrifices the only real validity which they possessed, and to secure for all of God's elect an eternal heritage.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising