(b) 17 19. if any one sin, and do any of the things which the Lord hath commanded not to be done The description of the sin in this case is the same as that in Leviticus 4:2; Leviticus 4:13; Leviticus 4:22; Leviticus 4:27. In what respect do these sins (which here require a Guilt-Offering) differ from those in ch. 4 for which a Sin-Offering is prescribed? The difference is indicated in the words -though he knew (-wist" A.V.) itnot." They are not the same as the Heb. expression rendered unwittingly(concerning his ignoranceA.V.), for in Leviticus 5:18 they occur as a further qualification of a thing done -unwittingly." The sins of ch. 4. are those of which a person becomes conscious(Leviticus 4:14; Leviticus 4:23; Leviticus 4:28). In such case he must offer a Sin-Offering. But the case here supposed is that of one who fears that he has been guilty of some infringement of the Divine commands, but cannot specify it.

He brings a ram as Guilt-Offering (in the same manner as in the preceding case (15, 16)), but no restitution is demanded as the amount cannot be estimated, since the offence remains unknown. This sacrifice was called by the Jews ("âshâm tâluy), lit. a suspended Guilt or Trespass-Offering. It was a voluntary offering, and relieved a troubled conscience. It is recorded of one pious Jew that he brought a sacrifice of this kind every day except on the day following the Great Day of Atonement.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising