Mark 9:9-13

10. THE DISCIPLES ASK ABOUT ELIJAH. 9:9-13.

TEXT 9:9-13

And as they were coming down from the mountain, he charged them that they should tell no man what things they had seen, save when the Son of man should have risen again from the dead. And they kept the saying, questioning among themselves what the rising again from the dead should mean. And they asked him, saying, The scribes say that Elijah must first come. And he said unto them, Elijah indeed cometh first, and restoreth all things: and how is it written of the Son of man, that he should suffer many things and be set at nought? But I say unto you, that Elijah is come, and they have also done unto him whatsoever they would, even as it is written of him.

THOUGHT QUESTIONS 9:9-13

435.

Why would the transfiguration mean more after the resurrection?

436.

Had the three disciples heard of the approaching death of Jesus?had any word of His resurrection been given?

437.

Why inquire at this particular time about Elijah? Cf. Malachi 4:5-6.

438.

Who were the scribes mentioned in Mark 9:11?

439.

In what sense had Elijah already come?

440.

What was to be restored by Elijah?

441.

In what way did Jesus associate His death with the coming of Elijah?

442.

To whom did Jesus refer when He said Elijah had come?

443.

Where was it written concerning the death of John the BaptistCf. 1 Kings 19:2; 1 Kings 19:10.

COMMENT

TIMESummer A.D. 29 immediately after the transfiguration.
PLACEComing down from the mount of transfiguration,

PARALLEL ACCOUNTSMatthew 17:9-13.

OUTLINE1. The command for silence, Mark 9:9. Mark 9:2. The thought of resurrection was strange to the disciples, Mark 9:10. Mark 9:3. They ask about the coming of Elijah, Mark 9:11. Mark 9:4. Jesus answers, Mark 9:12-13.

ANALYSIS

I.

THE COMMAND FOR SILENCE, Mark 9:9.

1.

As they came down from the mount.

2.

Tell no man what you have seen.

3.

Wait to tell until I have been raised from the dead.

II.

THE THOUGHT OF THE RESURRECTION WAS STRANGE TO THE DISCIPLES, Mark 9:10.

1.

They thought on what Jesus said.

2.

They asked among themselves what He might mean by rising from the dead.

III.

THEY ASKED ABOUT THE COMING OF ELIJAH, Mark 9:11.

1.

If you are the Messiah (as we believe you are);

2.

In light of your prediction of death and resurrection how is it said Elijah must come first?

IV.

JESUS ANSWERS, Mark 9:12-13.

1.

It is trueElijah must come first and restore all things.

2.

It is also true that the Son of man must suffer and be rejected.

3.

Elijah in the person of John the Baptist has come and they have treated him as predicted.

EXPLANATORY NOTES

THE DESCENT FROM THE MOUNT

In what state of mind did the apostles return from beholding the glory of the Lord, and His ministers from another world? They seem to have been excited, demonstrative, ready to blaze abroad the wonderful event which ought to put an end to all men's doubts.
They would have been bitterly disappointed, if they had prematurely exposed their experience to ridicule, cross-examination, conjectural theories and all the controversy which reduces facts to logical form, but strips them of their freshness and vitality. In the first age as in the nineteenth, it was possible to be witnesses for the Lord without exposing to coarse and irreverent handling all the delicate and secret experiences of the soul with Christ.
Therefore Jesus charged them that they should tell no man. Silence would force back the impression upon the depths of their own spirits, and spread its roots under the surface there.
Nor was it right to make such a startling demand upon the faith of others before public evidence had been given, enough to make scepticism blameworthy. His resurrection from the dead would suffice to unseal their lips. And the experience of all the Church has justified that decision. The resurrection is, in fact, the centre of all the miraculous narratives, the sun which keeps them in their orbit. Some of them, as isolated events, might have failed to challenge credence. But authority and sanction are given to all the rest by this great and publicly attested marvel, which has modified history, and the denial of which makes history at once untrustworthy and incoherent. When Jesus rose from the dead, the whole significance of His life and its events was deepened.

This mention of the resurrection called them away from pleasant daydreams, by reminding them that their Master was to die. For Him there was no illusion. Coming back from the light and voices of heaven, the cross before Him was as visible as ever to His undazzled eyes, and He was still the sober and vigilant friend to warn them against false hopes. They however found means of explaining the unwelcome truth away. Various theories were discussed among them, what the rising from the dead should mean, what should be in fact the limit to their silence. This very perplexity, and the chill upon their hopes, aided them to keep the matter close.
One hope was too strong not to be at least hinted to Jesus. They had just seen Elias. Surely they were right in expecting his interference, as the scribes had taught. Instead of a lonely road pursued by the Messiah to a painful death, should not that great prophet come as a forerunner and restore all things? How then was murderous opposition possible?
And Jesus answered that one day this should come to pass. The herald should indeed reconcile all hearts, before the great and notable day of the Lord come. But for the present time there was another question. That promise to which they clung, was it their only light upon futurity? Was not the assertion quite as plain that the Son of Man should suffer many things and be set at nought? So far was Jesus from that state of mind in which men buoy themselves up with false hope. No apparent prophecy, no splendid vision, deceived His unerring insight, And yet no despair arrested His energies for one hour.
But, He added, Elias had already been offered to this generation in vain; they had done to him as they listed. They had re-enacted what history recorded of his life on earth.
Then a veil dropped from the disciples-' eyes. They recognized the dweller in lonely places, the man of hairy garment and ascetic life, persecuted by a feeble tyrant who cowered before his rebuke, and by the deadlier hatred of an adulterous queen. They saw how the very name of Elias raised a probability that the second prophet should be treated as it is written of the first.
If then they had so strangely misjudged the preparation of His way, what might they not apprehend of the issue? So should also the Son of man suffer of them.
Do we wonder that they had not hitherto recognized the prophet? Perhaps, when all is made clear at last, we shall wonder more at our own refusals of reverence, our blindness to the meaning of noble lives, our moderate and qualified respect for men of whom the world is not worthy.
How much solid greatness would some of us overlook, if it went with an unpolished and unattractive exterior? Now the Baptist was a rude and abrupt person, of little culture, unwelcome in king's houses. Yet no greater had been born of woman. (G. A, Chadwick)

FACT QUESTIONED 9:9-13

489.

In what state of mind did the apostles return from beholding the glory of the Lord, and His ministers from another world?

490.

What would have happened if they had told prematurely the events of the mount?

491.

How would silence help the disciples?

492.

Show how all other miracles relate to the resurrection.

493.

Why was it that Jesus was thinking about His death upon coming down from the mount?

494.

What Malachi 4:5-6 saidwhat the scribes had said did not agree with what Jesus saidat least in the minds of the disciplesexplain.

495.

Are we to yet expect the return of Elijah? i.e. before the second coming of Christ?

496.

When did the veil drop from the eyes of the disciples?

497.

In what sense are we in danger of doing the same thing the three apostles did?