1 THESSALONIANS 2:7 nh,pioi {B} From a transcriptional point of view it is difficult to decide whether nh,pioi arose by dittography after the preceding &n, or whether h;pioi arose by haplography. Likewise, considerations of what the author was more likely to have written are equally inconclusive. T... [ Continue Reading ]
1 THESSALONIANS 2:12 kalou/ntoj {B} Apparently under the influence of Galatians 1:6 the Textus Receptus adopted the aorist tense kale,santoj, with a A 104 326 606 1611 1831 1906 1912 2005 and a variety of versions (the weight of whose testimony, however, is diminished by idiomatic considerations).... [ Continue Reading ]
1 THESSALONIANS 2:15 profh,taj {A} The Textus Receptus reads ivdi,ouj profh,taj, following a variety of secondary witnesses (Dc K Y most minuscules syrp, h goth _al_). Whether these somehow derived the reading from Marcion, who inserted the word in order to limit the reference to _Jewish_ prophets... [ Continue Reading ]
1 THESSALONIANS 2:16 ovrgh, {A} Several witnesses, chiefly of the Western type of text (D F G _al_), add the clarification that “the wrath” is none other than “the wrath of God.” Other witnesses move ovrgh, before evpV auvtou,j, preferring to have the subject nearer the verb.... [ Continue Reading ]