2 THESSALONIANS 3:6 parela,bosan {B} The reading that seems best to explain the origin of the others is parela,bosan (a* A (D* evla,bosan) 33 88 1827 1845 2005 Basil), whose dialectic termination 1 was corrected later to pare,labon (ac Dc K L P 81 614 1739 _Byz Lect al_). Since the third person is... [ Continue Reading ]
2 THESSALONIANS 3:8 nukto.j kai. h`me,raj A majority of the Committee preferred the reading with the genitives (supported by a B F G 33 81 104 255 256 263 442 1611 1845 1908 2005), which is in conformity with Paul’s usage in 1 Thessalonians 2:9 and 1 Thessalonians 3:10. The reading with the accusa... [ Continue Reading ]
2 THESSALONIANS 3:16 tro,pw| {A} In several witnesses, chiefly Western (A* D* F G 33 76 itd, g, 61, 86 vg goth Ambrosiaster Chrysostom), the reading tro,pw|, which is strongly supported by a Ac B Dc K P Y 81 614 1739 _Byz Lect_ syrp, h copsa, bo _al,_ is replaced by to,pw|, a more usual expression,... [ Continue Reading ]
2 THESSALONIANS 3:18 u`mw/n) {A} The liturgical avmh,n has been introduced by copyists into most witnesses; those that have resisted include a* B 6 33 328 424c 462 1739 1836 vgmss copsa, bomss arm Ambrosiaster Athanasius Pelagius.... [ Continue Reading ]