Acts 4:22 gego,nei

Manuscripts B and D unite in attesting gego,nei, whereas all other witnesses read evgego,nei. According to Moulton-Howard, in the New Testament the augment of the pluperfect is usually dropped (Grammar, p. 190). They go on to comment that “in Attic writers the temporal augment is omitted, but not the syllabic, MSS and edd. notwithstanding (see e.g. Ti[schendorf] on Acts 4:122…).” In the light of the evidence that they produce to substantiate their dictum, it appears that evgego,nei is the result of the Atticistic revival in the early Christian centuries. 118


118 For further information on the pluperfect see Blass-Debrunner-Funk, § 66(1), and P. Chantraine, Histoire du parfait grec (Paris, 1927).

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising

Old Testament