Ephesians 2:17 eivrh,nhn (2)

The Textus Receptus, following several later witnesses (K L many minuscules syrp, h al), omits the second instance of eivrh,nhn, probably because it seemed redundant and therefore superfluous. Its presence, however, not only is strongly attested by good witnesses (î46 a A B D F G P itd, g vg copsa, bo goth arm eth al), but also adds significantly to the force of the writer’s statement.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising

Old Testament