Revelation 11:17 o[ti {B}

The reading o[ti, in the view of a majority of the Committee, is to be preferred because of superior external evidence (ac A P 046 1 1611 1854 2053 itgig, h vg syrph, h copsa al) and because it best explains the origin of the readings. The addition of o` evrco,menoj o[ti (051 1006 sixteen minuscules vgmss and the Textus Receptus) is a typical Byzantine accretion, in imitation of the tripartite expression in Revelation 1:4, Revelation 1:8; cf. Revelation 4:8. The reading kai. o[ti, although supported by î47 a* C 2344 copboms arm, strains the syntax and appears to be a scribal blunder.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising

Old Testament