Revelation 14:1
REVELATION 14:1 to, (1) {A} The presence of to, before avrni,on is strongly supported by a A C _al_; it is lacking in î47 P 051 and a number of minuscules, followed by the Textus Receptus.... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:1 to, (1) {A} The presence of to, before avrni,on is strongly supported by a A C _al_; it is lacking in î47 P 051 and a number of minuscules, followed by the Textus Receptus.... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:3 @w`j# {C} The weight of the external evidence supporting the presence of w`j (A C 1006 1841 2042 itar vg syrph _al_) is about equal to that supporting its absence (î47 a P 046 1611 1854 2053 (2344) itgig syrh copsa, bo arm eth _al_). It is difficult to decide whether the word was me... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:5 a;mwmoi The introduction of the connective ga,r (î47 a 046 1006 1611 2344 itar vgmss syrph, h copsa, bo _al,_ followed by the Textus Receptus) is a natural addition for copyists to make, especially in view of the expression parqe,noi ga,r eivsin in the previous verse; whereas there... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:6 a;llon a;ggelon {B} The more difficult reading, which is strongly supported by A C 1006 1611 2053 2344 itgig, ar vg syrph, h copbo arm Cyprian _al,_ is to be preferred. The absence of a;llon (î47 a* 046 most minuscules copsa Origen _al_) is either an accidental omission (due to the... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:8 a;lloj a;ggeloj deu,teroj {B} The reading that seems to explain best the origin of the others is a;lloj a;ggeloj deu,teroj, which is supported by ac (C deu,teron) P 051 1611 2053 _al_ (the versional evidence is without much force) and by the sequence of a;lloj a;ggeloj tri,toj in ve... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:13 nai,( le,gei {A} Although the shorter reading le,gei (î47 a* 336 582 620 628 1918 copbo eth) may be thought to be primitive, and the other readings scribal expansions, it is perhaps more probable that nai,( le,gei is original, for it is strongly supported (ac A C P 051 1006 1611 18... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:18 a;ggeloj @evxh/lqen# evk tou/ qusiasthri,ou {C} On the one hand, it can be argued that evxh/lqen was inserted by scribes from ver. Revelation 14:17, sometimes after a;ggeloj (a C P 046 most minuscules ith syrph, h copsa, bo arm _al_) and sometimes after qusiasthri,ou (051 1854 2073... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 14:20 cili,wn e`xakosi,wn Instead of 1600 stadia, a reading well supported by ac A C P 046 most minuscules, versions, and patristic references, several inferior witnesses read 1606 stadia (cili,wn e`xakosi,wn e[x, 1876 2014 2036 2037 2042 2043 2046 2047 2074 2082 Andrewa); a few other w... [ Continue Reading ]