Revelation 2:7
REVELATION 2:7 qeou/ {A} A number of minuscules, influenced by the recollection of qeou/ mou in Revelation 3:2 and four instances of the expression in Revelation 3:12, have added mou to qeou/ in Revelation 2:7.... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 2:7 qeou/ {A} A number of minuscules, influenced by the recollection of qeou/ mou in Revelation 3:2 and four instances of the expression in Revelation 3:12, have added mou to qeou/ in Revelation 2:7.... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 2:13 VAntipa/j Since the context seems to demand the genitive VAntipa/, several modern exegetes (including Swete, Charles, Zahn) adopt Lachmann’s conjecture that, after accidental dittography of the definite article (antipaoomartuc), the first omicron was taken as a sigma. The Committee... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 2:16 ou=n The Textus Receptus, following a P 1 2053 vg syrh _al_, omits ou=n. A majority of the Committee preferred the reading with ou=n, which is supported by A C 046 1006 1611 1854 syrph copsa, bo, and explained its absence in other witnesses as due either to transcriptional oversigh... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 2:20 gunai/ka {B} On the basis of what was regarded as preponderant testimony, a majority of the Committee preferred the reading gunai/ka without sou (a C P 1 1611 2053 2344 Old Latin vg copsa, bo arm eth Tertullian _al_). The reading with sou (“your wife Jezebel”), which requires a;ggel... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 2:22 kli,nhn {A} Instead of kli,nhn, which is decisively supported by a C P 046 1 1006 1611 1854 2053 2344 itgig, ar vg syrph, h copbo _al_, several witnesses, wishing to increase the punishment threatened to Jezebel, have introduced various glosses. Thus, A reads fulakh,n, probably der... [ Continue Reading ]