Revelation 2:16 ou=n

The Textus Receptus, following a P 1 2053 vg syrh al, omits ou=n. A majority of the Committee preferred the reading with ou=n, which is supported by A C 046 1006 1611 1854 syrph copsa, bo, and explained its absence in other witnesses as due either to transcriptional oversight (after &son) or to taking metano,hson with the preceding o`moi,wj.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising

Old Testament