REVELATION 21:3 qro,nou Instead of qro,nou, which is attested by a A 94 vg Irenaeuslat Tyconius Ambrose Augustine Haymo, the Textus Receptus, following P 046 almost all minuscules and most versions, reads ouvranou/. The latter appears to be an assimilation to evk tou/ ouvranou/ of ver. Revelation... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 21:4 @o[ti# ta. prw/ta {C} On the one hand it can be argued that the reading ta. prw/ta, which is strongly supported by A P 051 1006 1611 2053 _al,_ is original and that copyists sought to avoid asyndeton by inserting o[ti or ga,r. On the other hand, however, it is altogether possible t... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 21:12 @ta. ovno,mata# {C} Whether scribes considered that the words ta. ovno,mata were superfluous in the context, and therefore omitted them (a P 051 _al_), or that they were needed for the sense, and therefore added them (A 1611 1841 1854 _al_), it is difficult to decide; consequently... [ Continue Reading ]