REVELATION 5:6 ta. @e`pta,# {C} The evidence for the presence of e`pta, before pneu,mata (î24 a 046 1854 2053 2344 2432 itgig syrph, h copsa, bo arm Hippolytus _al_) is fairly evenly balanced against the evidence for its absence (A Pvid 1 1006 1611 itar vg eth Irenaeusarm _al_). From the transcript... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 5:9 tw/| qew|/ {A} Although the evidence for tw|/ qew|/ is slight (A eth), this reading best accounts for the origin of the others. Wishing to provide hvgo,rasaj with a more exactly determined object than is found in the words evk pa,shj fulh/j k)t)l), some scribes introduced h`ma/j eith... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 5:10 auvtou,j {A} The third person pronoun, which is overwhelmingly supported, was replaced by h`ma/j in several versional and patristic witnesses, followed by the Textus Receptus.... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 5:13 kai, (5) {B} In order to provide a verb for the relative clause (with or without an additional relative pronoun), after qala,sshj some witnesses read evsti,n( kai, (A 1006 1611c 1854 2344 _al_), others read a[ evstin( kai, (P 046 1 2073 2081 _al_, followed by the Textus Receptus),... [ Continue Reading ]