REVELATION 8:1 o[tan Although a P and almost all minuscules, followed by the Textus Receptus, read o[te, the Committee preferred o[tan, which is supported by A C 1006 1611 1841. The reading o[te seems to be an assimilation to the six instances of o[te h;noixen in chap. Revelation 6:1. (For another... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 8:8 puri, The word puri, is absent from 046, about 125 minuscules, syrph _al_. A majority of the Committee preferred to include the word on the basis of its presence in such diversified witnesses as a A P 052 1006 1854 2053 2344 itgig, (h), ar vg syrh copsa, bo _al_. The word may have b... [ Continue Reading ]
REVELATION 8:13 avetou/ Instead of avetou/ (which is decisively supported by a A 046 most minuscules itgig, h vg syrph, h copsa, bo eth) the Textus Receptus, following P 1 680 2059 2060 2081 2186 2286 2302 arm _al_, reads avgge,lou. The substitution may have been accidental (a scribe misread aetou... [ Continue Reading ]