Romans 11:31

Romans 11:31 @nu/n# (2) {C}

Once again external evidence and internal considerations are rather evenly balanced. A preponderance of early and diverse witnesses favors the shorter reading. On the other hand, the difficulty in meaning that the second occurrence of nu/n seems to introduce may have prompted either its deletion or its replacement by the superficially more appropriate u[steron. In view of such conflicting considerations it seemed best to retain nu/n in the text but to enclose it within square brackets.