Composition and Authorship of the Gospel. The first Gospel, though compiled from various sources, is a literary unity, the work of a single writer. This is shown by the occurrence of various characteristic phrases, not in certain sections only, but throughout the work. Thus the phrase 'the kingdom of heaven,' which is found in St. Matthew alone, occurs 14 times in sections which are peculiar to St. Matthew,, 18 times in sections which are common to him and St. Luke or St. Mark. Also the peculiar phrase 'that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet,' which occurs nowhere else in the NT., occurs in nearly every part of the first Gospel: see Matthew 1:22; Matthew 2:15; Matthew 2:17; Matthew 2:23; Matthew 4:14; Matthew 8:17; Matthew 12:17; Matthew 13:35; Matthew 21:4; [Matthew 26:56;] [Matthew 27:9;] [Matthew 27:35;]. It is plain, therefore, that the same compiler has worked over the whole of the book, and given it such unity as it possesses.
The author's sources were somewhat numerous, and several of them can still be clearly distinguished. His principal authority for narrative was St. Mark's Gospel, which he probably possessed in its complete form, in which it contained an account of an appearance of the risen Lord in Galilee: see Mark 16:7. He evidently wrote with this Gospel before him, making it the basis of his work, and inserting his additional matter, gained from other sources, at appropriate intervals, but very seldom departing from its order. In transcribing St. Mark, he reproduced his words with considerable exactness, but usually abridged them, generally only slightly, but sometimes very considerably. For example, St. Mark's account of the Gadarene demoniac runs to 20 vv., while St. Matthew's has only 7 vv. He seldom adds anything of importance to St. Mark's narrative. The chief exceptions are the account of the Temptation, where he adds important details from another source (Matthew 4:1), that of the walking on the sea, where he adds the incident of Peter descending from the ship (Matthew 14:22), that of the confession of Peter at Csesarea Philippi, which is described much more fully (Matthew 16:13.). Altogether, St. Matthew has about 470 vv. out of a total of 1,068 vv. parallel to St. Mark, that is, he borrows nearly half his Gospel from St. Mark.
Another source (or sources) is indicated by the large amount of matter which St. Matthew has in common with St. Luke. A complete list of these correspondences, amounting in all to about 200 vv., or nearly one-fifth of the Gospel, has already been given (see art. 'The Synoptic Problem'), and the reader is requested to refer to it. He will find that in at least two-thirds of the cases, the subject-matter (which consists mainly of discourses and sayings) has been placed differently by the two evangelists, and that the variations of phraseology are also very considerable. This suggests that not more than one-third (if so much) of the correspondences between St. Matthew and St. Luke are due to the use of a common document, and that, for the most part, they used different sources. Our evangelist's main source for discourses seems to have been a document (called 'the Logia') in which our Lord's sayings were collected in masses according to subject-matter; but the sources of the discourses in St. Luke seem to have been documents in which our Lord's sayings were preserved in their proper historical connexion. There is no sufficient evidence to show that our evangelist grouped together in his Gospel sayings that were separate in his sources, but rather the contrary, for he several times expresses his conviction that the great groups of sayings, which St. Luke separates, were delivered at one time and place, and this he would hardly have done if his sources had recorded them in widely-separated contexts: see especially Matthew 7:28; Matthew 11:1; Matthew 13:53; Matthew 19:1; Matthew 26:1.
A third group of sources is indicated by the matter peculiar to St. Matthew. This amounts to about 400 vv., and consists of the following sections:—
Matthew 1:1.
Genealogy of Jesus.
Matthew 1:18.
The Nativity.
Matthew 2:1.
The Magi; the massacre of the Innocents.
Matthew 2:19.
Flight into Egypt.
Matthew 3:14; Matthew 3:15.
St. John's scruple about baptising Jesus.
Matthew 4:12.
Isaiah's prophecy fulfilled (Isaiah 9:1).
Matthew 4:23; Matthew 4:24.
Tours in Galilee.
5, 6, 7.
Much of the Sermon on the Mount.
Matthew 9:27.
The two blind men.
10.
About 8 vv. of the charge to the Twelve.
Matthew 11:28.
'Come unto me, all ye that labour.'
Matthew 12:5.
The priests profane the sabbath and are blameless.
Matthew 12:17.
Isaiah 42:1 fulfilled.
Matthew 12:36; Matthew 12:37.
Every idle word.
Matthew 13:14; Matthew 13:15.
Fulfilment of Isaiah 6:9.
Matthew 13:24.
Parable of the tares.
Matthew 13:35.
Fulfilment of Psalms 78:2.
Matthew 13:36.
Interpretation of the parable of the tares.
Matthew 13:44.
Parable of the hid treasure.
Matthew 13:45; Matthew 13:46.
Parable of the pearl-merchant.
Matthew 13:47.
Parable of the net.
Matthew 13:52; Matthew 13:53.
'Every scribe which is instructed.'
Matthew 14:28.
Peter walks on the waves.
Matthew 15:12;
'Every plant which my heavenly (in part). Father.'
Matthew 15:23.
'I am not sent but unto the lost sheep.'
Matthew 15:28.
Many are healed.
Matthew 16:11; Matthew 16:12.
The leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees (but cp. Mark 8:15).
Matthew 16:17.
'Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona.'
Matthew 17:24.
The stater found in the fish's mouth.
Matthew 18:4; Matthew 18:7; Matthew 18:10; Matthew 18:14.
Sayings about children.
Matthew 18:15.
'If thy brother shall trespass.'
Matthew 18:21.
'Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me?
Matthew 19:10.
Celibacy for the kingdom of heaven's sake.
Matthew 20:1.
Parable of labourers in the vineyard.
Matthew 21:4; Matthew 21:5.
Fulfilment of Isaiah 62:11; Zechariah 9:9.
Matthew 21:10; Matthew 21:11.
Astonishment of Jerusalem at the triumphal entry.
Matthew 21:14.
The blind and lame healed in the Temple.
Matthew 21:15; Matthew 21:16.
The children cry 'Hosanna' in the Temple.
Matthew 21:28.
Parable of the two sons.
Matthew 21:43.
'The kingdom of God shall be taken from you.'
Matthew 22:1.
Parable of the marriage of the king's son (the wedding garment).
Matthew 23:1; Matthew 23:8; Matthew 23:14; Matthew 23:24.
Woes pronounced on scribes and Pharisees.
Matthew 24:11.
'Many false prophets shall rise.'
Matthew 24:12.
'The love of many shall wax cold.'
Matthew 24:30.
The sign of the Son of Man in heaven.
Matthew 25:1.
Parable of the ten virgins.
Matthew 25:14.
Parable of the talents (yet cp. St. Luke's parable of the pounds, Luke 19:12).
Matthew 25:31.
Parable of the sheep and the goats.
Matthew 26:25.
Judas asks, 'Master, is it I?'
Matthew 26:52.
'Put up again thy sword.'
Matthew 26:53; Matthew 26:54.
'Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father?
Matthew 27:3.
Remorse, suicide, and burial of Judas.
Matthew 27:19.
Pilate's wife.
Matthew 27:24; Matthew 27:25.
Pilate washes his hands.
Matthew 27:51.
Earthquake, opening of tombs, and resurrection of saints.
Matthew 27:62.
The tomb sealed, and a watch set.
Matthew 28:2.
A great earthquake. An angel bright as lightning rolls away the stone, and terrifies the guards.
Matthew 28:9.
Jesus appears to the women.
Matthew 28:11.
The guards report to the chief priests, who spread a false report.
Matthew 28:16.
Appearance on a mountain in Galilee.
Of this peculiar matter we may assign to the 'logia' most of the discourses and sayings, which include parts of the Sermon on the Mount, of the charge to the Twelve, of the denunciations of the Pharisees; also the parables of the tares, the hid treasure, the pearl-merchant, the net, the labourers in the vineyard, the two sons, the wedding garment, the ten virgins, the talents, and the sheep and the goats. Certain incidents similar in character to the common synoptic tradition, such as the Baptist's scruple (Matthew 3:14), the tours in Galilee (Matthew 4:23), the healing of the two blind men (Matthew 9:27), the healing of the blind and lame in the Temple (Matthew 21:14), the children's cry of Hosanna (Matthew 21:15), the question of Judas (Matthew 26:25), the remorse of Judas (Matthew 27:3), perhaps also the appearance to the women (Matthew 28:9), and to the eleven in Galilee (Matthew 28:16), seem to point to the use of an authentic narrative source somewhat resembling St. Mark's Gospel. Very little of the Gospel seems due to oral, as distinguished from written, tradition—perhaps only the Nativity (which is confirmed in its essential features by the independent narrative of St. Luke), the visit of the Magi (which fits well into secular history, and is thoroughly credible), the incident of the temple-tribute, and certain details in the narrative of the resurrection, such as the resurrection of the saints, and the setting of a watch. On these the notes should be consulted.
From what has been said, it will be evident that direct authorship of this Gospel by the apostle Matthew is improbable. If St. Matthew had been the author, he would probably have given his own account of the transactions, and not have laboriously occupied himself with collecting and transcribing 'sources.' At the same time a connexion with the apostle Matthew is probable. The name of so obscure an apostle would hardly have been connected with the Gospel without some good reason. Ancient tradition (first in Papias, 130 a.d.) credits St. Matthew with the composition of a book of 'logia' or 'oracles,' written in Hebrew (Aramaic), which may have been a brief Gospel, but was more probably a collection of discourses classified (as we have already suggested) according to subject-matter. Of a Greek translation of these 'logia' our author seems to have made such liberal use, that he acknowledged his obligations to the apostle by calling his work 'according to Matthew.' St. Matthew, therefore, is responsible for the discourses, but probably not for the history.
The author was undoubtedly a Jewish Christian, familiar with Hebrew, and trained in rabbinical methods. His quotations from the OT. (when they are not copied from St. Mark) generally follow the Hebrew rather than the Greek. He arranges his book on the arithmetical principles so common in rabbinical writings, and shows a particular fondness for the Numbers 7:5; Numbers 7:3; Numbers 7:10. Thus there are seven beatitudes, seven petitions in the Lord's prayer (not five, as in St. Luke), seven woes denounced against the Pharisees; also the names in the genealogy are arranged in multiples of seven (7 x 2); there are five chief collections of our Lord's discourses, three temptations, three chief duties of religion (Matthew 6:1), three prayers in Gethsemane; also between the first and second discourses of Jesus the evangelist inserts ten miracles (Matthew 8:9). Seven is, of course, the number of the sabbath day, five of the books of Moses, three of the priestly blessing, and ten of the plagues of Egypt. The author also shows his Jewish predilections in his affectionate references to Jerusalem as 'the holy city,' and 'the holy place' (Matthew 4:5; Matthew 24:15; Matthew 27:53).