Verse Genesis 5:3. And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, c.] The Scripture chronology especially in the ages of some of the antediluvian and postdiluvian patriarchs, has exceedingly puzzled chronologists, critics, and divines. The printed Hebrew text, the Samaritan, the Septuagint, and Josephus, are all different, and have their respective vouchers and defenders. The following tables of the genealogies of the patriarchs before and after the flood, according to the Hebrew, Samaritan, and Septuagint, will at once exhibit the discordances.

ANTEDILUVIAN PATRIARCHS LIVED BEFORE THEIR SONS' BIRTH


Heb.

Samar.

Sept.

Adam, Genesis 5:3

130

130

230

Seth, Genesis 5:6

105

105

205

Enos, Genesis 5:9

90

90

190

Cainan, Genesis 5:12

70

70

170

Mahalaleel, Genesis 5:15

65

65

165

Jared, Genesis 5:18

162

62

162

Enoch, Genesis 5:21

65

65

165

Methuselah, Genesis 5:25

187

67

167

Lamech Genesis 5:28

182

53

188

Noah, at the flood, Genesis 7:6

600

600

600

Total before the flood,

1656

1307

2242*

In this first period the sum in Josephus is 2256, which is also adopted by Dr. Hales in his New Analysis of Chronology.


POSTDILUVIAN PATRIARCHS LIVED BEFORE THEIR SONS' BIRTH


Heb.

Samar.

Sept.

Shem begot Arphaxad after the flood, Genesis 11:10

2

2

2

Arphaxad, Genesis 11:12

35

135

135

Cainan (2d) mentioned only by the LXX. and Luke 3:36

0

0

130

Salah, Genesis 11:14

30

130

130

Eber, Genesis 11:16

34

134

134

Peleg, Genesis 11:18

30

130

130

Reu, Genesis 11:20

32

132

132

Serug, Genesis 11:22

30

130

130

Nahor, Genesis 11:24

29

79

179

Terah, Genesis 11:26

70

70

70

Total to the 70th year of Terah,

292

942

1172*

In this second period the sum in Josephus is 1002.

* The Septuagint account of the ages of the antediluvian and postdiluvian patriarchs in the above tables, is taken from the VATICAN copy, but if we follow the ALEXANDRIAN MS., we shall have in the first period the whole sum of 2262 instead of 2242 and in the second period, 1072 instead of 1172. On this subject the different MSS. of the Septuagint abound with various readings.

For much satisfactory information on this subject I must refer to A New Analysis of Chronology, by the Rev. William Hales, D.D., 3 vols. 4to., London, 1809.

And begat a son in his own likeness, after his image] Words nearly the same with those Genesis 1:26: Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. What this image and likeness of God were, we have already seen, and we may rest assured that the same image and likeness are not meant here. The body of Adam was created provisionally immortal, i.e. while he continued obedient he could not die; but his obedience was voluntary, and his state a probationary one. The soul of Adam was created in the moral image of God, in knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness. He had now sinned, and consequently had lost his moral resemblance to his Maker; he had also become mortal through his breach of the law. His image and likeness were therefore widely different at this time from what they were before; and his begetting children in this image and likeness plainly implies that they were imperfect like himself, mortal like himself, sinful and corrupt like himself. For it is impossible that he, being impure, fallen from the Divine image, could beget a pure and holy offspring, unless we could suppose it possible that a bitter fountain could send forth sweet waters, or that a cause could produce effects totally dissimilar from itself. What is said here of Seth might have been said of all the other children of Adam, as they were all begotten after his fall; but the sacred writer has thought proper to mark it only in this instance.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising