Joshua 10:11

Verse Joshua 10:11. The Lord cast down great stones from heaven upon them] Some have contended that stones, in the common acceptation of the word, are intended here; and that the term hail-stones is only used to point out the celerity of their fall, and their quantity. That stones have fallen from the clouds, if not from a greater height, is a most incontestable fact. That these have fallen in different parts of the world is also true; the East Indies, America, France, Germany, England, Ireland, c., have all witnessed this phenomenon: of such stones I possess and have seen several fragments some considerable pieces may be seen in the British Museum. That God might have cast down such stones as these on the Canaanites, there can be no doubt, because his power is unlimited; and the whole account proves that here there was a miraculous interference. But it is more likely that hail-stones, in the proper sense of the word, are meant as well as expressed in the text. That God on other occasions has made use of hail-stones to destroy both men and cattle, we have ample proof in the plague of hail that fell on the Egyptians. Exodus 9:18. There is now before me a square of glass, taken out of a south window in the house of Mr. Ball of Crockerton, in the parish of Longbridge Deverell, county of Wilts., through which a hail-stone passed in a shower that fell there June 1, 1780, at two o'clock, P.M. The hole is an obtuse ellipsis or oval, and is cut as true as if it had been done with a diamond: it is three inches and a half in diameter; a proof that the stone that pierced it, which was about eleven inches in circumference, came with inconceivable velocity, else the glass must have been shivered to pieces. I have known a cannon ball go through a square of glass in the cabin window of a ship, and make precisely the same kind of hole, without either shattering or even starring the glass. It is needless to add that this hail-shower did great damage, breaking even trees in pieces, and destroying the vegetation through the whole of its extent. But allowing that extraordinary showers of hail have fallen in England or France, is it likely that such showers ever fell in the promised land or its vicinity? They certainly have. Albertus Aquensis, one of the writers in the collection Gesta Dei per Francos, in describing the expedition of Baldwin I. in the Holy Land, observes that, when he and his army were in the Arabian mountains, in the vicinity of the Dead Sea, they suffered incredibly from horrible hail, terrible frost, and indescribable rain and snow, so that thirty of his men perished by them. His words are: "Sexta vero die montanis permensis, in extremo illorum cacumine maxima pertulerunt pericula, in GRANDINE horribili, in GLACIE terribili, in PLUVIA et NIVE inaudita, quorum immanitate, et horrore ingruente ad triginta homines pedites prae frigore mortui sunt." - Hist. Hieros., p. 307. I conclude, therefore, that a shower of hail-stones may be meant; and that this shower, though natural in itself, was supernaturally employed on this occasion, and miraculously directed to fall where it did, and do the execution described.

But I am ready to grant, notwithstanding, that as a most stupendous miracle was in this instance wrought, in causing the sun and moon to stand still; there can be no doubt that the shower of stones, which was also miraculous, might have been of real stones as well as hail-stones. Of late, this subject of the fall of real stones from the clouds has been very closely investigated, and not only the possibility of the fall of such stones from the clouds, or from much higher regions, but the certainty of the case has been fully demonstrated. These substances are now, in philosophical language denominated aeroliths or air-stones; and the following table constructed by M. Izarn, a foreign chemist, exhibits a variety of facts of this kind, and shows the places and times in which these substances fell, and the testimony by which these facts are supported. As it is as possible that God might have projected a shower of stones on these idolaters, even from the moon, as to arrest that planet in her course, I give the table, and leave the reader to decide, in the present case, for aeroliths or hail-stones, as may seem to him most congruous to the fact here related.

Historical Record of Large Hail Stones

	SUBSTANCES	PLACES WHERE THEY FELL
1	Shower of stones	At Rome.
2	Shower of stones	At Rome.
3	A very large stone	Near the river Negos, Thrace.
4	Three large stones	In Thrace.
5	Stone of 72 lbs	Near Larissa, Macedonia.
6	About 1,200 stones; one 120 lbs	Near Padua in Italy.
7	Another of 60 lbs
8	Another of 59 lbs	On Mount Vasier, Provence.
9	Two large stones weighing 20 lbs	Liponas, in Bresse.
10	A stony mass	Niort, Normandy.
11	A stone of 7 ½ lbs	At Lure, in Le Maine.
12	A stone	At Aire, in Artois.
13	A stone	In Le Cotentin.
14	Extensive shower of stones	Environs of Agen.
15	About 12 stones	Sienna Tuscany.
16	A large stone of 56 lbs	Wold Cottage, Yorkshire.
17	A stone of 10 lbs	In Portugal.
18	A stone of about 120 lbs	Sale department of the Rhone
19	Shower of stones	Benares, East Indies.
20	Shower of stones	At Plann, near Tabor, Bohemia
21	Mass of iron, 70 cubic feet	America.
22	Mass of ditto, 14 quintals	Abakauk, Siberia.
23	Shower of stones	Barboutan, near Roquefort
24	Large stone, 260 lbs	Ensisheim, Upper Rhine.
25	Two stones, 200 and 300 lbs	Near Verona.
26	A stone of 20 lbs	Sales, near Ville Franche.
27	Several ditto from 10 to 17 lbs	Near L'Aigle, Normandy.

	PERIOD OF THEIR FALL	TESTIMONY
1	Under Tullus Hostilius	Livy.
2	Consuls, C. Martius and M. Torquatus	J. Obsequens.
3	Second year of the 78th Olympiad	Pliny.
4	Year before J.C., 452	Ch. of Count Marcellin.
5	January, 1706	Paul Lucas.
6,7	In 1510	Carden, Varcit.
8	November 27, 1627	Gassendi.
9	September, 1753	De La Lande.
10	In 1750	De La Lande.
11	September 13, 1768	Bachelay.
12	In 1768	Gurson de Boyaval.
13	In 1768	Morand.
14	July 24, 1790	St. Amand, Baudin, c.
15	July, 1794	Earl of Bristol.
16	December 13, 1795	Captain Topham.
17	February 19, 1796	Southey.
18	March 17, 1798	Le Lievre and De Dree.
19	December 19, 1798	J. Lloyd Williams, Esq.
20	July 3, 1753	B. de Born.
21	April 5, 1800	Philosophical Magazine.
22	Very old	Pallas, Chladni, c.
23	July, 1789	Darcet, jun., Lomet, c
24	November 7, 1492	Butenschoen.
25	In 1762	Acad. de Bourd.
26	March 12, 1798	De Dree.
27	April 26, 1803	Fourcroy.

These stones generally appear luminous in their descent, moving in oblique directions with very great velocities, and commonly with a hissing noise. They are frequently heard to explode or burst, and seem to fly in pieces, the larger parts falling first. They often strike the earth with such force as to sink several inches below the surface. They are always different from the surrounding bodies, but in every case are similar to one another, being semi-metallic, coated with a thin black incrustation. They bear strong marks of recent fusion. Chemists have found on examining these stones that they very nearly agree in their nature and composition, and in the proportions of their component parts. The stone which fell at Ensisheim in Alsace, in 1492, and those which fell at L'Aigle in France, in 1803, yielded, by the Analysis of Fourcroy and Vanquelin, as in this table: -

Ensisheim stone fell A.D. 1492	L'Aigle stone fell A.D. 1803
56 0	54	of silica
30 0	36	-oxyd of iron
12 0	9	-magnesia
2 4	3	-oxyd of nickel
3 5	2	-sulphur
1 4	1	-lime
105 3	105

Their specific gravities are generally about three of four times that of water, being heavier than common stones. From the above account it is reasonable to conclude that they have all the same origin. To account for this phenomenon, various hypotheses have appeared we shall mention three:

1. That they are little planets, which, circulating in space, fall into the atmosphere, which, by its friction, diminishes the velocity, so that they fall by their weight.

2. That they are concretions formed in the atmosphere.

3. That they are projected from lunar volcanoes. These are the most probable conjectures we can meet with, and of these the two former possess a very small degree of probability, but there are very strong reasons in favour of the last. Among the reasons we may notice the following:

1. Volcanoes in the moon have been observed by means of the telescope.

2. The lunar volcanoes are very high, and the surface of that globe suffers frequent changes, as appears by the late observations of Schroeter.

3. If a body be projected from the moon to a distance greater than that of the point of equilibrium between the attraction of the earth and moon, it will, on the known principle of gravitation, fall to the earth.

4. That a body may be projected from the lunar volcanoes beyond the moon's influence, is not only possible but very probable for on calculation it is found that four times the force usually given to a twelve pounder, will be quite sufficient for this purpose; it is to be observed that the point of equilibrium is much nearer the moon, and that a projectile from the moon will not be so much retarded as one from the earth, both on account of the moon's rarer atmosphere, and its less attractive force. On this subject, see Mr. Haward's valuable paper in the Philosophical Transactions for 1802, and Dr. Hutton's dissertation in the new abridgment, part xxi. It is highly probable that the ancile, or sacred shield, that fell from heaven in the reign of Numa Pompilius, was a stone of this sort. The description of its fall, as given by Ovid, Fast. lib. iii., bears a striking resemblance to recent accounts of stones falling from the atmosphere, particularly in the luminous appearance and hissing noise with which it was accompanied.

Dum loquitur, totum jam sol emerserat orbem,

Et gravis aethereo venit ab axe fragor.

Ter tonuit sine nube Deus, tria fulgura misit:

Credite dicenti; mira, sed acta, loquor.

A media coelum regione dehiscere coepit:

Summisere oculos cum duce turba suos.

Ecce levi scutum versatum leniter aura

Decidit, a pupulo clamor ad astra venit.

Tolit humo munus ________________________

Idque ancile vocat, quod ab omni parte recisum est.

It is very possible that the Palladium of Troy, and the Image of the Ephesian Diana, were stones which really fell from the atmosphere, bearing some rude resemblance to the human form. See the IMPERIAL ENCYCLOPAEDIA, article Aerolith.

I believe it is generally agreed among philosophers,

1. That all these aerial stones, chemically analyzed, show the same properties;

2. That no stone found on our earth possesses exactly the same properties, nor in the same proportions. This is an extraordinary circumstance, and deserves particular notice.