Jean 1:19-28

The record of John

I.

AN INSTRUCTIVE EXAMPLE OF TRUE HUMILITY.

1. John was an eminent saint of God (Matthieu 11:11; Jean 5:35),yet we see him lowly and self-abased.

(1) He refuses the honour which the Jews were ready to pay him;

(2) He declines all flattering titles;

(3) He asserts that he is only a voice and a baptizer with water;

(4) He exalts Christ alone.

2. The greatest saints in every age have been men of the Baptist’s spirit.

(1) They have differed widely in gifts;

(2) They have been all alike in humility; seeking not their own honour, thinking little of themselves, giving Christ the preeminence. This is the secret of the honour Christ has put upon them Luc 14:11).

3. Let us cultivate this spirit;

(1) This is the initial saving grace;

(2) We have no religion without it;

(3) All saints may have it;

(4) It will appear most beautiful in death and at the Judgment.

II. A MOURNFUL EXAMPLE OF THE BLINDNESS OF UNCONVERTED MEN.

1. The Jews professed to be waiting for the Messiah, and yet at the moment of the manifestation of Christ they were utterly dark (verse 26). And, worse than this, the vast majority would never know Him.

2. John’s words apply to thousands now. Christ stands among those who know Him not. Money and pleasure they know. They are asleep with salvation within reach. Application:

1. Do we know the extent of our religious privileges?

2. Do we know that Christ rejected will be soon Christ withdrawn. (Bp. Ryle.)

The confession of John

I. AS IT RESPECTED HIMSELF.

1. He confessed I am not the Christ. This is a hard saying for human nature. Though death is working in every part, it will be its own saviour if it can. Man may be willing to take the reform of John wherewith to gild his own pretensions, but he is offended with the idea that he needs salvation at the hands of another. But there is no hope for him until he confesses it.

2. He confessed that he was not Elias nor any of the prophets. He came, indeed, in the spirit and power of Elias (Matthieu 11:14), and was “more than a prophet”: but not in their sense. Ah! the deceitfulness of the human heart! To have such popular preachers, to be united to such a mighty Church--this pleases the natural man. But John’s example teaches us to renounce all prophets, save only as they set Christ forth.

3. He confessed he was not worthy to perform the most menial cruces for Christ. The greatest of men sink into nothing before the glory of Christ. And if such was John’s unworthiness, considering who he was, what is ours, considering who we are?

II. AS IT RESPECTS THE CHRIST.

1. He bore witness to Christ’s preexistence, and therefore to His divinity.

2. To His coming after him, and therefore to His humanity.

3. To His real presence, and any one searching for Him can find Him now in His Word and sacraments; and He is present now as then, as the Messiah, with all His Messianic blessings.

4. To his atonement (Jean 1:29).

III. AS IT RESPECTS OUR RECEPTION OF CHRIST.

1. We are to give heed to the testimony of Christ’s heralds.

(1) Those who speak to us in the Scriptures;

(2) Those who minister in sacred things;

2. We must set ourselves to work in Christ’s way;

(1) By repentance (Jean 1:23);

(2) By faith (Jean 1:29). (J. A. Seiss, D. D.)

The Forerunner’s confession

I. BY WHOM MADE. John: on the testimony of the Evangelist (Jean 1:19) and his own (Jean 1:23).

1. The Evangelist’s estimate of John was high (Jean 1:6). The dignity of his person, the nobility of his character, the elevation of his calling (comp. Pro 32:2).

2. His estimate of himself was low (Jean 1:23); an obscure desert preacher, an echo sounding through moral wastes, an insignificant forerunner, a water baptizer who could not touch the impure heart. This language revealed the essential humility of his nature (Jean 3:20; cf. Philippiens 2:3), the felt loneliness of his position (Jean 3:26; cf. Kings 19:10), his feebleness (Jean 3:27; cf. 2 Corinthiens 12:9), the fruitlessness of his mission (Jean 1:25).

II. WHEN DELIVERED. On the occasion of the Embassy and after the Baptism. It was

1. Timely: given at the moment required (1 Pierre 3:15).

2. Prompt: without hesitation or reluctance, knowing that he had nothing to conceal or to be ashamed of (2 Timothée 1:8.)

3. Consistent: the same to the legates and to the populace (Matthieu 5:37; Corinthians 1:8.)

4. Final (Hébreux 10:2; Jean 3:6).

III. TO WHOM ADDRESSED. The deputation from Jerusalem (verse 19).

1. Composed of Priests and Levites, who would keep each other in countenance, and perhaps overawe the desert prophet by their combined importance.

2. Prompted by growing excitement in the Temple authorities at John’s popularity. Perhaps hastened by report of Christ’s baptism. Those who enter on evil courses are easily alarmed (Job 18:7.) Rulers governing by force or fraud are afraid of democratic commotions.

3. Instructed to ask who the Baptist was. Public men must expect to be criticized and questioned out of jealousy, fear, and even hate.

IV. OF WHAT COMPOSED. Of his testimony concerning himself.

1. Negatively:

(1) Not the Christ concerning whom he volunteers no information Proverbes 29:11; Ecclésiaste 3:7);

(2) Not Elias, i.e, in the sense they meant; although he was Elias in the sense of Malachi (verse 5), and Christ (Matthieu 11:14);

(3) Not the prophet: neither Moses nor Jeremiah (Job 10:21;Zacharie 1:5.)

2. Positively:

(1) A voice in the wilderness;

(2) A herald of Jehovah.

(3) A baptizer;

(4) A servant of Christ.

Learn:

1. The best qualifications for a witness of Christ--humility and courage.

2. The secret of success in life--to know who oneself is not as well as who oneself is.

3. The inferiority of all Christ’s servants to himself. (T. Whitelaw, D. D.)

The Forerunner and his Lord

I. A GREAT QUESTION.

1. there was something in the man that called it forth. Speaking generally, every man is an enigma. Many men, however, go through life without being challenged. Men of the regulation type, whose individuality never strikes you--such men have an easy time of it and give others no trouble. There are others whose strong and striking individuality is an intolerable nuisance to a slumbering, self-complacent society--heroes, reformers, martyrs. Such was John. No one could mistake him for any one else. Hence he was put on his defence and cross-examined.

2. There was something in the times that called forth this question. The world was throbbing with expectation. Heathen religion and philosophy ended in a query. The lost deity of Athens was a note of interrogation. The Jews had grown weary of the stereotyped platitudes of the Rabbis. Men could not help contrasting these days with those of the prophet. And now John came with words of living fire, and thousands exclaimed, “this is the Prophet.” The phylactured class looked profound and shook their heads. Others responded, “No amount of head shaking will account for this miracle of a man: While you shake your head he is shaking multitudes.” It was natural that the spirit of inquiry awakened by him should be first exercised upon him.

II. A GREAT ANSWER. It is not difficult to give our estimate of other men, but very difficult for a man of delicate feeling to estimate himself, and most difficult to a man of John’s popularity. If there be any littleness in him it will show itself now. John had summed up other people; what about his estimate of himself! An exaggerated estimate had been formed of him. Will he have genius and modesty enough to correct it? Yes.

1. He answers negatively, and brushes away all exaggerations.

2. He answers in the affirmative

(1) concerning himself. Isaiah had only noticed the voice and message. John would not do otherwise

(2) concerning Him for whom he had been mistaken. Every true preacher finds his way from every question to Christ.

(a) He is near;

(b) He stands. Not one who hurries through like a passing stranger;

(c) He is unrecognized;

(d) He is the Lamb of God. (David Davies.)

The mission of John the Baptist

It was no affair of his to determine his own latitude and longitude in the chart of the world’s history. That was for his cotemporaries to do, not for him. That was their responsibility, not his. It was for him not to be thinking about himself and what he might possibly be, but to do his work, to fulfil his mission, to bear his testimony.

1. You cannot have forgotten how our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, being tempted in the wilderness, took up, in opposition to the tempter, not any special or exceptional ground such as He might claim as Messiah and Son of God, but common human ground, such as any poor tempted, suffering mortal may stand on and be safe. The language of the evangelist reveals his profound sense of the difficulty of the situation and of the nobleness of the Baptist’s demeanour in it: “He confessed, and denied not: but confessed, I am not the Christ.” It was so easy to equivocate, to give an ambiguous answer; so hard to return a decisive, resolute, unhesitating “no.” The false prophet would have returned a very different answer. The true prophet must take up common human ground, and so be help and strength to his sinful, suffering, tempted fellow-men. “Is the way of the Lord straight, or not? Is every obstacle removed out of his path, every offence out of His kingdom? If not, then it is my duty, and yours, to help to make it straight. This is all that I profess or claim to do. Necessity is laid upon me, and do it I must.”

2. But again--there is a shadow of loneliness and isolation in the reply, “I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness.” And so it must always be when the circumstances are at all similar. John the Baptist was far in advance of his cotemporaries; was at a far higher spiritual level than they. There was only One who could thoroughly under stand, appreciate, and sympathize with him--his Master and ours, Jesus Christ. If your work is the fruit of real conviction, if it is inspired by true ideas, the work will live, the ideas will triumph, will spread and propagate themselves and mould other minds--on a small scale it may be, and in a very humble way--until it shall be a surprise even to yourself to witness it. John’s work lives even to this day. His thoughts still mould us.

3. And, once more, there is a feeling of hope and joy in the reply, as well as a shadow of loneliness and isolation. John the Baptist could not forget, any more than we can, that the words which he selected to describe his work are imbedded in a passage of which this is the opening strain: “Comfort ye, comfort ye, My people, saith your God.” True prophet and earnest worker for God that he was, he could not but find joy in his work, for the work’s own sake, as well as sorrow. For it is the very nature of such work to bring both joy and sorrow. It is so still. Whatever be the work which is given us to do, whatever be the path of duty for us, if we will but throw ourselves heartily into the one, and tread the other firmly and diligently, hope and interest and joy are sure to spring up around us. In some way or other the work is sure to bring a multitude of wholesome human interests along with it. (D. J. Vaughan, M. A.)

The mission from Jerusalem

The work of John and its results would seem to have come up formally before the Sanhedrim, and this mission was born of their professional dealing with the matter. They had suffered him to go on for some time without taking any public notice of him, Gamaliel-like thinking. If this be of man, it will come to nought; if of God, it will prove itself. And so the resolution probably was: Wait and take the winning side. I suppose they looked upon the Forerunner as one who was going up like a rocket and would come down as a stick. They do not send a deputation till they must. They did not like this interloper, but comforted themselves with the thought that the worst would soon blow over, and that the enthusiasm, too fierce to last, would soon cool down. At length, when they found that it was not to be pooh-poohed, they said, “We must see to the bottom of this.” But it would not have been dignified to come to examine into matters themselves, so they sent a deputation to obtain an account of who John was and what he was about. (A. B. Grosart, D. D.)

The Sanhedrim,

though of considerable antiquity, was not of Mosaic origin, nor was it called by that name until the days of Antipater and Herod. In the time of Christ it was composed of seventy-one members, chosen from

1. The chief priests and their families, the officiating high priest being president;

2. The elders, including both priests and laymen, and

3. The scribes, professional jurists, or experts in law. The court resembled that of Jehoshaphat’s time (2 Chroniques 19:8), and possessed the power of judging a tribe, a false prophet, and a chief priest. It was not so much a theological court, to whose jurisdiction belonged all offences against the theocratical principles of the State, as the supreme native tribunal of Judea, to which all matters were referred that could not be dealt with in inferior courts, or that were not reserved by the Procurator. In the exercise of its judicial capacity, therefore (Deutéronome 18:12), these emissaries were sent to inquire into John’s credentials as a prophet. (T. Whitelaw, D. D.)

The Baptist’s temptation

This may be regarded as a temptation of John corresponding to the simultaneous temptation of Christ. John refused the titles in which the hierarchical party expressed their false views, even as Christ refused to satisfy their expectations by the assumption of external power. (Canon Westcott.)

Is it a little thing to have a deputation waiting upon you from the capital, in whose heart there is evidently a very special expectation, and to hear them say, “Who art thou?” in a tone which seems to imply “We shall not be surprised if thou dost reveal thyself as the very light we have been expecting.” This temptation often seizes a man, and, extending himself beyond his proper function and calling by flattering persuasions, the result is self-mortification and ignominy; and he who might have done something really good goes out of the world having mis-spent his little day. When a man says, “I claim infallibility,” and, whether at Rome or in London, he commits the most grievous sins, though he wear the holiest of names. Look at John, see how the great men crowd round him. It never occurred to him that he was some great one. Hence the subtlety of these tempting flatteries. But he baffled them, and kept them at arm’s length. He would have no compliments, and declined the illustrious titles that were offered him one by one. But this was not enough. John did not stop at the half truth. A man may resist a temptation to lie, and yet conceal the whole of the truth he has been commissioned to tell. If John was not the Christ, but knew who the Christ was, it was not enough for him to decline the Messiahship. He must declare the Christ. This he did with a promptness, clearness, and fulness that puts many a so-called evangelical ministry to the blush. Hence John came out unscathed, and was rewarded by one of the greatest eulogies ever pronounced by Christ on man. (J. Parker, D. D.)

Levites.

It was by no accident that these were mentioned. John was of the national priesthood, and thus descended from the Levites. It is just possible therefore that relatives or family friends being turned for the nonce into deputies, he might be more easily persuaded to fall in harmony with that foregone conclusion to which they would guide him. Thus a disturbing element of personal relationship would enter into the temptation to assert himself, and to surcease his lowly subordination of himself to that “other” Christ who could by no possibility be accepted by these temporal Messiah-expecting Jews. (A. B. Grosart, D. D.)

Who art thou?--The botanist, in his rambles along the lanes and among the hedgerows, passes by hundreds of flowers without pausing to look at them. A momentary glance is enough. He has seen so many of the same kind before. But now and then he sees a flower which invites his curiosity. He takes his pocket lens, and, with many a keen, scrutinizing, gaze he asks, “What art thou? What sayest thou of thyself.” This was the principle in which these religious scientists came to John. He did not belong to their schools, and had not been classified in their catalogue of men and professions. In what niche could he be placed? Such a man is an awkward one for classification. He is a class in himself. He cannot be bracketed with others. (David Davies.)

I am not the Christ.--A gentleman heard two distinguished ministers one Sunday. Recording his experience, he said: “In the morning I could not see the Master for the man; in the evening I could not see the man for the Master.” (David Davies.)

Ministers must send men to Christ

A member of Ebenezer Erskine’s congregation recorded that having gone once to that godly man to express his admiration and gratitude for a particular sermon, Mr. Erskine accepted gratefully the latter but dismissed the former peremptorily, and asked with kindling eye, “Did the sermon lead you to Christ? If never before did you then and there give yourself to Jesus Christ?” The preacher’s fidelity was painful at the moment, and was resented; but after reflection led the visitor to acknowledge that, but for the preacher’s turning away the conversation from praise of the sermon to Jesus Christ, he would have been little or nothing the better for it. As it was he was sent to Christ. The pointed question set him thinking and praying, and he never rested until he had given himself to the Lord Jesus. (A. B. Grosart, D. D.)