Jean 19:35

And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true

The Gospel witness

I. THE SIGHT--the whole crucifixion, but especially what constituted its essence as an evangelical fact, viz., the issue of blood and water, an emphatic testimony to the Redeemer’s death. This is one of the most important texts of the Bible. If no one saw Christ die, how can we be sure that He did die; and unless we are sure of His death we are left in uncertainty as to His atonement and resurrection, and consequently as to our salvation and futurity. John saw a sight

1. Most wonderful. Great is the mystery of godliness all through--nowhere more than here. That God should become incarnate is inexplicable, no less so that being incarnate He should die. Learn here

(1) The limits of human reason.

(2) The very manhood of Christ.

2. Most painful--to all whose feelings are not utterly brutalized. The death-bed of an ordinary friend, or even a stranger, under the best circumstances, is sufficiently painful; but what must such a man as John have felt as he saw such a Friend nailed to the cruel tree? Learn here

(1) The inhumanity of man.

(2) The feelings with which we should contemplate Christ crucified.

3. Most beneficent. Such a mysterious scene enacted, and such dreadful sufferings endured voluntarily, must have been for some adequate purpose. Martyrdom for truth falls far short of it. The only adequate motive is Joh 3:16; 1 Jean 2:2. God incarnate was crucified to save a world.

II. THE TRUE RECORD.

1. Such an event actually took place.

(1) John could not have been mistaken; if the senses were deceptive here, when all was so striking, then they are trustworthy nowhere.

(2) John was not a madman--his Gospel and Epistles are a sufficient proof of that.

(3) John was not a deceiver; he suffered the loss of all things, and imperilled his life for the sheer sake of recording what he saw.

2. What took place John was bound to record.

(1) Not simply as an important historical fact, although he had responsibilities here.

(2) But as a display of Divine mercy, and the sole means of human salvation. “Woe is me,” he might have said, “if I write not the gospel.”

3. This record he knew to be true. Because

(1) He saw what he recorded.

(2) He knew that he was a truthful man.

(3) Reading what he had written he was sure that it was in accordance with the whole of the facts. Nothing essential was omitted; nothing false or superfluous was included.

III. THE EVANGELICAL PURPOSE.

1. Not personal display. John was a deep thinker and a graphic writer; but it was the furthest from his intention to pose as a philosopher, or to excite admiration as a rhetorician.

2. Not to excite emotion. How different the narrative from the scenic and heart-harrowing descriptions in books of devotion and pulpit declamations.

3. But to create belief. Hence the record is clear, earnest, tender, and full of subtle spiritual influence.

Learn the qualifications of a true Gospel witness.

1. He must have actually seen what he endeavours to describe. Theory and hearsay are worthless here. There must be clear, positive experience of Christ crucified.

2. Fidelity. He must confine himself to what he has seen--not his fancies or speculations, but what he knows of Christ’s love and salvation.

3. A sense of responsibility. He has a medicine that has cured him, and can cure every one. He is wicked therefore to keep it to himself.

4. A sincere and self-abnegating motive--not to court admirers but to win believers. (J. W. Burn.)

The evidences of truth

The truth we receive from another may either derive its authority from the teacher, or reflect on him the authority it contains. As the receiver of money may argue, either that money is good because it is an honest man who pays it, or that the man is honest because he pays good money, so in the communication of truth, it may be a valid inference, either that the doctrine is true because it is a trustworthy man who teaches it, or that the man who teaches it is a veracious and trustworthy because his doctrine is true. (J. Caird, D. D.)

Testimony dependent on the character of the witness

Dr. Weyland was once lecturing on the weight of evidence furnished by human testimony, and was illustrating its sufficiency for establishing the truth of miracles. “But,” said one of his students, “what would you say, doctor, if I stated that as I was coming up College Street, I saw the lamp-post at the corner dance?” “I should ask you where you had been, my son,” was the quiet reply.