1 Coríntios 15:1

Comentário de Ellicott sobre toda a Bíblia

XV.

(1) Moreover, brethren. — This chapter is throughout occupied with the DOCTRINE OF THE RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD. The occasion which caused the Apostle to dwell at such length and with such emphasis on this subject was the denial of the resurrection by some members of the Corinthian Church. It has been suggested by some writers that what the Apostle had to combat was a false conception of the resurrection — that at Corinth there were probably those who refined away the doctrine of the resurrection into merely a rising from the death of sin into a life of righteousness, something after the manner of Hymenæus and Philetus (2 Timóteo 2:17), who taught that “the resurrection was past already.” It seems clear, however, from the emphatic statement in 1 Coríntios 15:12, and from the general scope and drift of the entire argument, that what the Apostle is here meeting is not a perversion, but a denial of the doctrine. There were many elements in such a mixed body as the Corinthian Church which would have contributed to the growth of this error. Amongst the Jewish converts would be some traces of the Sadducean (Mateus 22:23) denial of the resurrection, and in the Gentile section of the Church there would linger the spirit of the Athenians who “mocked when they heard of the resurrection of the dead” (Atos 17:32), and of the Epicurean philosophers who said, “Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die.” From these and from other like sources there had crept into the Church itself a denial of the doctrine of the resurrection. In reading this chapter it is well to remember that the Apostle probably intended it, not only as a reply to these corruptors of the faith, but as supplying those who remained faithful with a confirmation of their own faith, and arguments with which they might meet their opponents. It is always difficult to give a clear, exhaustive analysis of an argument by such a writer as St. Paul. The enthusiasm of his nature leads him to mingle the syllogism of passion with the syllogism of logic; and, as he was not writing himself, but dictating the composition, a word often leads him off from his argument into some splendid outburst of pathetic exhortation, or of prophetic utterance. Still, including such digressions, the general argument of this chapter may be tabulated thus: —

I. — THE DOCTRINE OF THE RESURRECTION (1 Coríntios 15:1).

Subdivided as follows:

(1) The resurrection proved by the historical fact of Christ’s resurrection (1 Coríntios 15:1).

(2) The resurrection proved by an appeal to the moral consequences involved in a denial of it (1 Coríntios 15:16).

(3) The truth of the resurrection involved in certain existing practices (1 Coríntios 15:29).

II. — THE METHOD AND PRINCIPLE OF THE RESURRECTION (1 Coríntios 15:35).

(1)

Illustration from analogy (1 Coríntios 15:35).

(2) Illustration from our dual descent from. Adam and from Christ (1 Coríntios 15:44).

(3)

The great change (1 Coríntios 15:50).

(4)

A song of triumph (1 Coríntios 15:54).

(5)

Concluding exhortation (1 Coríntios 15:58).

I declare unto you. — The Apostle opens his historical argument by reminding the Corinthians that this is no new nor unimportant matter. It is the original gospel which he had preached to them, which they received, and in which they stand, and by which they are being saved (not “are saved,” as in the English).

Veja mais explicações de 1 Coríntios 15:1

Destaque