2 Crônicas 36:5
Comentário de Ellicott sobre toda a Bíblia
THE REIGN OF JEHOIAKIM (2 Crônicas 36:5). (Comp. 2 Reis 23:36 to 2 Reis 24:7; 2 Reis 3; 2 Reis 3 Esdr. 1:37-41; Jeremias 25:26)
(5) Jehoiakim... in Jerusalem. — 2 Reis 23:36, adding the mother’s name. here. So LXX.
And he did ... the Lord. — 2 Reis 23:37, which adds “according to all that his fathers had done.” So LXX.
Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon. — Nabium-kudurri-uçur (“Nebo guard the crown! “) son of Nabopalassar, who had founded this dynasty by successful revolt against Assyria. His extant inscriptions chiefly relate to palace and temple building. Schrader gives a short inscription from a brick now in the Zürich Museum. “Nabû-Kudurri-uçur, king of Babylon, restorer of Esagili and Ezida [two famous temples], son of Nabû-abala-uçur, King of Babylon am I.” No really historical inscription is known except a fragment relating to his Egyptian campaign in his 37th year (568 B.C.), and an illegible one on the rocks of Nahr-el-Kelb near Beirut. The LXX. here interpolates the account of Jehoiakim’s three years of vassalage, and his revolt against Nebuchadnezzar, and the other events and reflections contained in 2 Reis 24:1. The LXX. makes Jehoiakim, instead of Manasseh, “fill Jerusalem with innocent blood,” contrary to the Hebrew text.
And bound him in fetters. — Two bronze (chains), as in 2 Crônicas 33:11.
To carry him to Babylon. — To make him go. It is not said that this intention was carried out. (Comp. 2 Crônicas 33:11, “and carried him to Babylon.”) Nebuchadnezzar, who, according to Jeremias 46:2, had defeated Necho in a great battle at Carchemish, in the 4th year of Jehoiakim, appears to have left the king of Judah to reign as a vassal-king, after inflicting upon him a severe humiliation. (The LXX., 3 Esdr., Vulg., and Arabic, but not the Syriac, read: “and carried him to Babylon.”) Thenius says this must be the right reading, and then denies its claim to credibility. He further asserts that, “in order to allow ample scope for the fulfilment of the prophecy of Jeremiah” (see Note on 2 Crônicas 36:8), the chronicler has represented Jehoiakim as carried alive to Babylon in the last year of his reign. This statement rests not upon objective historical grounds, but upon subjective prejudices against the chronicler.
Daniel 1:1, by a transcriber’s error, puts this first capture of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar in the third year of Jehoiakim; whereas Nebuchadnezzar only became king in the fourth of Jehoiakim. (2 Reis 25:8; Jeremias 25:1.)