João 18:15

Comentário de Ellicott sobre toda a Bíblia

And Simon Peter followed Jesus. — Better, And Simon Peter was following Jesus. (Comp. Mateus 26:58.)

Another disciple. — The reading is not certain, but the majority of the better MSS. support the text of the Authorised version. Others have, “The other disciple,” which would mean, “The well-known disciple.” It has been usual to understand that John himself is intended by this designation, and this opinion agrees with the general reticence of the Gospel with regard to him. (Comp. João 1:40; João 13:23; João 19:26; and Introduction, p. 375.) It agrees also with the fact that Peter and John are elsewhere found in special connection with each other (Lucas 22:8; Atos 1:13; Atos 3:1; Atos 3:3; Atos 3:11; Atos 4:13; Atos 4:19; Atos 8:14). We are warranted, therefore, in saying that this opinion is probable, but not in assuming that it is necessarily true, as is often done. It may be, for instance, that by this term the Evangelist indicates his brother James, who is never mentioned in this Gospel. The fact that he is himself called “the disciple whom Jesus loved” (João 13:23; João 19:26; comp. Introduction, p. 375), is against rather than for the opinion that he is here called “another disciple.” If we adopt the reading, “the other disciple,” the opinion has more support.

Was known unto the high priest. — How he was known we have no means of judging. We may, however, note that the name “John” occurs among the names of the kindred of the high priest in Atos 4:6.

Into the palace of the high priest. — Better, perhaps, into the court of the high priest. (Comp. Mateus 26:3; Mateus 26:58; Mateus 26:69.) St. John uses the word elsewhere only of the sheepfold (João 10:1; João 10:16). It has been established beyond doubt that the title “high priest” may have been and often was given to those who had held the sacred office. We cannot, therefore, say positively that it is not here given to Annas. It is, however, in the highest degree improbable that it is given in this chapter, after the words of João 18:13, to Annas and Caiaphas without distinction. The writer has in that verse clearly marked out Caiaphas as the high priest that year, and consistency requires that we should uniformly understand him to be designated by the title.

The apparent difficulty here is met by the remark in João 18:13, that Annas was father-in-law to Caiaphas. (See Note there.)

Veja mais explicações de João 18:15

Destaque